Author Archives: John Kennedy

About John Kennedy

People often tell me I could be a great man. I'd rather be a good man.

The Three Tramps Part 5

Posted on by
Reply

The Three Tramps

And this is a sketch he did as a tribute to Lee Harvey Oswald. It’s just a sketch that he did, as he knew what happened and he knew Lee Harvey Oswald. Chauncey knew him and he really resented that he was a sacrificial lamb that day and was later killed by Jack Ruby.
Okay, let’s go to June 23 rd, 1965. It’s 1815 Driscoll Street in Houston, Texas. A nephew of this older couple Fred and Edwina Rogers, called the cops because they wouldn’t answer the phone and they wouldn’t come to the door. Charles Bullock, an officer, and his partner Leo Bartha made the scene.
They noticed a lot of the food was taken from the refrigerator and was sitting out in cans and tops, and there was a pair of dentures laying on the table too …. and they couldn’t find anything amiss untill ….
…. Bullock opened the refrigerator …
(Graphic picture not suitable for use)
and he thought perhaps they had slaughtered a hog … because it was still full of meat. And then he opened the crystalator door and he saw that there were heads in there and he realized what it was.
It was Fred Rogers … 81 years old ….
and Edwina Rogers, 79 years old. Female, the wife. And they had both been disected, joint by joint, and murdered.
And the only identifiable suspect is their son, Charles Rogers, who was estranged from his parents. This is the inside of his apartment as they found it. He only communicated with his mom by notes that he would pass under the door. He is very … he is enigmatic, because from the year of 1957 on, he was unemployed. We have his social security number and there is no monies taken out for federal tax, from him, from 1957 on. And again, this is 1965. And yet for two years, in 1958 and 1959, he owned an airplane and kept it and paid hangar fees to have it kept at Hull Airport. And there is no way, he had no means of any visual support to be able to pay for even fuel or an airplane, or the fees the keep it stored there.
When they went out there, they found kind of a probe kitchen situation …..
where he would make food on a hot plate in his room.

The Three Tramps

And there was a pack with a lot of newspaper articles.
They als found this gun. It’s the kind that usually are issued to federal workers, but of course other people can have them. But they found this gun and it had been wiped clean, there were no fingerprints. And it was indeed the weapon that was used to kill Edwina. And then he had taken a hammer, it was believed that he killed his father with a hammer. What happened is that she went to his door and … because he murdered her outside of his door, and dragged her down the stairs. He mopped up the stairs a little bit, not a very good job of mopping. And he took her to the bath tub and bled her out and disected her there.
This is the saw he used. There is lots of flesh and blood in that saw. It is very obviously the weapon used, or the tool, the utensil to take them apart, his parents.
(Graphic picture not suitable for use)
And then there is this …
And here is a picture of Charles Rogers. From the Navy, he was in the Navy. But he was also in the Navy intelligence corps. I don’t know exactly what they call it, but all of the armed forces, everyone knows that after World War II all of the armed forces, their intelligence people were merged together to form the CIA. And we are in possession of a document that says he was in Navy Intelligence.
Here is his highschool picture where he is smiling.
And there is the shorter tramp. Charles Rogers was five foot five, a 145 pounds, and he was 41 years old that day. every single feature is consistent. The only thing is the the person on the right has aged, from that highschool picture.

Editor’s note: Unfortunately, there is hardly any photo known of Charles Rogers contemporary with the 1963 time frame. Only photo’s of a much younger Charles Rogers are available. The look of people’s appearances may alter with age. Although the shorter tramp may look somewhat different to the untrained eye, every facial structure and dimension is consistent.
And on the left you notice the man with the tie. Those sixties’ thin ties. He has got his head down. Notice the bones shape in his forehead …
The hairline. Everything. To me this definitely could be Charles Rogers.
Here is another picture. Do you notice that even though the blond tramp is behind him, he still comes off looking a little taller? He should appear way shorter because in the distance things get smaller. So he is obviously shorter than Charles Harrelson.

The Three Tramps Part 3

Posted on by
Reply

The Three Tramps

And I did a drawing with an opaque projector. Artists will know that a projector, an opaque projector, you project the picture on a piece of paper and you can trace everything exactly. It’s a really sophisticated tracing machine. Leonardo Da Vinci used candles and invented the first opaque projector. He used mirrors and whatever. So I used a mechanical device to sketch the ear of Harrelson from his mug-shot and the blond tramp. And it’s just .. it’s as close to identical as you can get.
Another view of the tramp on the right and Harrelson , smiling at his murder trial.
And another picture …
…. of the blond-headed tramp. Even the superciliary arch is identical, that’s the bony ridge that your eyebrows sit upon. The corners of the mouth.
Now, it was being said that aah .. I believe the name of this person is Gedney and some people came out and said “Well, Gedney is the blond tramp”. But it is so obvious, even to the casual observer… Okay, after I published my findings, some other people came up, some investigators said that it was this man on the right, Mr. Gedney, who has since deceased, he has died.

But if you look at the blond tramp …. Gedney’s nose is just way too short … and his lips are further away from his nose. Do you see how, on the blond tramp and on Harrelson, the lips are next to the nose, kind of closer, way closer than this gentleman here, Gedney … on the right. There is no platsic surgery available, nor would anybody want one, to make your mouth closer to your nose. And then there’s no plastic surgery available to make your nose shorter, lengthwise. Now they can make it, the contours that stick away from your face, they can tone that down, but they can’t make the nose shorter. So this is absolutely, positively not the blond tramp. Gedney is not him. Even a six-year old child could observe this and know that.

Editor’s note: Look at the horizontal lines drawn on the faces. The line trough the base of the ears goes over the tip of the nose of the blond tramp. With Gedney it does not even hit the nose. It is closer to his lips.
Now let’s look at the older tramp, what they call the older tramp, he has got a hat on. And he was very distressed.
Chauncey Holt is on the left. This is a photograph I took of him in approximately 1992. He would have been 41 or 42 at the day of the assassination and on the left he is in his sixties. Every single feature on that man’s face is … to the best of my ability, considering the lapse in time, I must say is identical. If you study this picture real well, the tramp on the right-hand side, you can actually discern those vertical wrinkles that go on between the eyes. When you flex your facial muscles, like when you get angry, you make those wrinkles and he has those in the same place, just not as deep. The nose-shape is the same, the eyes, everything. I mean, to me it’s self explainatory, even that wrinkle on his neck, on the left, it has dropped a little bit because of age, but that wrinkle is in the same place, that goes across what you call your adam’s apple. It’s just every single feature.
Here is a picture of Chauncey Holt in 1963. He got a lot of sun or for whatever reasons, perhaps genetic, he has maybe more wrinkles than you would think someone that age should have.

The Three Tramps Part 2

Posted on by
Reply

The Three Tramps

Here is a picture of Charles Harrelson when he was arrested by the Houston Police Department and he would be about 20 years old.
And if you run a line through his eyes and his lips, they are not parallel either. There is a slight angle.
This kind of thing you don’t lose as you get older, you still keep that. It’s bone structure, it doesn’t change.
Nor is there any plastic surgery available that will change that for you.
If you look at the blond-headed tramp, he has that same angle. And actually it is impossible for me to get an exact pose from a historical photo and a mug-shot considering the disparity in time, place, angle, position of the head.
That angle, that angle is almost identical
Look at Charles Harrelson on the right. In that picture on the right, Charles Harrelson is being walked into his trial for the murder of judge John Woods. So grim is the situation that the name of the building he is walking into, is the “Judge John Woods Justice Center”. And yet he is smiling.

If you look on the left at the tramp, you have that same smile, which is occurring the same day as (and) just after John Kennedy has been killed. It goes to attitude, as much as it does goes to facial structure because indeed every single feature is consistent, considering I can’t take Harrelson in the right-hand picture and roughle his hair up and I don’t have his exact position. But considering the exact position and the time lapse, it’s the same person.
Taking another look at the three tramps ….
And you get another picture of Harrelson on trial, for murder, he was convicted in San Antonio, and on the left the tramp picture. Both of these men are blond. On the right the lighting is such that, you know, you can take a picture of a blond-headed person and it will come out looking brown, but he is definitely a blond-headed individual. The cheeks, the nose, the end-of-the-nose shape, the lips, the chin, …. all he has done is age on the right. That’s the same, as far as you can be determined considering the time lapse, that is the same individual.
And when you have a profile of one of the tramps, you draw a line of the profile – and again, this is impossible to pose this man exactly like the mug-shot – but considering the difference in pose and the difference in time ….
…. that’s the same profile, it is almost identical.